And then it hit me...

American Idol is almost over, so if you yawn through/don't read the posts about American Idol. Be strong--only one more week until I won't be posting about it any more! I just read a very interesting article that has my mind turning. The article focused on the fact that "The real rebel in this competition is David Archuleta." It is brilliant. He continues, "David fits no mold whatsoever, and that’s precisely why the press has had such difficulty trying to explain and categorize him (definable buckets being the critical workaround to having to characterize something truly original). Oh, the critics have tried glibly to pigeonhole David as a Disney type or a Christian singer or a boy-band figure, and there are perhaps elements of all of these in him, but none define him with any real measure, not the way the simple moniker of “rocker” defines David Cook. Originality is the true iconoclast, and indeed the only value that has the potential to really change the game, if not the world. I think David has a better chance of doing that without the crown."
And here is my favorite part:
"But most of all, the winner of this competition becomes saddled with the American Idol brand even more so that the runners-up, and that’s a dubious achievement to be sure. The question is really whether the American Idol brand is truly congruent with the David Archuleta brand, and the short answer is that no one knows just yet what the David Archuleta brand is. The worst thing that can be done right now is to over-define it with the heavy-handed mantle of “American Idol.” When David does finally determine the scope of his professional character he will almost certainly see the title as a hindrance more than a help.
In the beginning, it seemed obvious that David Archuleta was the quintessential American idol. Who better to serve as an example of young talent and national pride than a wholesome, handsome teenager from middle America with such refreshing humility, and manners that would put a diplomat to shame? But I’ve gradually come to see that the title–at least in the way that 19 Entertainment defines it, or even for that matter the way the majority of the American public wants it–is too narrow for David.
In many ways, David Cook is the ideal American Idol. He’s familiar, he’s predictable, he fits easily into a predefined genre with which everyone is quite comfortable. Because the scope of his professional character is already delineated the additional branding of American Idol won’t succeed in fully defining him. But perhaps most important, he’ll make people feel as though they’re choosing something a bit rebellious when in fact they’re choosing the most conventional contemporary archetype of them all."
I don't mean to bash on David Cook--because I think he is extremely talented and will be very successful. But as I posted earlier on my blog, I feel like there are things about American Idol that are so ridiculous and absurd that I would prefer my favorite NOT to win. I'm sure Chris Daughtry isn't bawling himself to sleep over not winning "the crown"...he's doing just fine. And Taylor Hicks who? Exactly.I was upset with Tuesday night's show because it was so obviously favored towards Cook. The song choices were a joke for Syesha and Archie. A commenter on the article says, "I listened to a radio show today that featured Richard Parkinson, David’s music arranger and pianist, for the last 2 1/2 years. He said that they had worked out a new, contemporary version of “Longer” for David’s performance on Tuesday. He said it was hot, that it would have been the only thing people were talking about on Wednesday. However, American Idol producers shot it down, told them they had to do a straight cover of John Fogelberg’s song." Tell me that's fair. I dare you. Anyway, I guess we'll see what happens next week. I will still be voting for Archie because I know how badly he wants this and because I think it would be exhilarating to see all his hard work be justified in such a big way, but honestly, I know he is capable of more than what the "AI" stigma will give him. No matter what happens--I'm an Archie for life!
Thoughts?
Article found here by "Rascal"


Comments
What I have issues with is how everyone is talking about David Archuleta as though he has super human powers. He is a FANTASTIC singer and he is humble and a great role model, but saying that he is going to change the world really bothers me. That is major pressure for a high school student who happens to love to sing. So what if they don't become superstars, this show allows them to get paid for doing something they love. Daughtry is living that dream and happens to be very successful at it... and at the same time, Taylor Hicks is making a living far beyond what he used to be doing and GETS TO DO WHAT HE LOVES.. Isn't that what's it's all about? To me, it doesn't really matter if they sing in front of hundreds or millions.. they still get to paid to sing.
I honestly feel a little bad for Archie and believe the press and his fans are doing him a disfavor for IDOLizing him the way they do. He is a great kid, but it's almost as though he's getting this pure and holy label that makes him seem perfect and that's a lot to have to live up to. He deserves to win, I hope he does.. but at this point, hasn't his dream already come true? I don't know if I would wish superstardom on anyone-- especially a good old boy from Murray. I just really hope he is able to be himself and live a life doing what he loves to do.
that's my two cents.
Yeah, the contestants are getting paid to sing, but even Carrie Underwood admitted that her first album (with A.I.) wasn't everything she wanted it to be because of the CONTROL that A.I. has on the contestants. You don't have the freedom that you would have otherwise when crowned the "idol".
Some fans truly are IDOLizing David, but I feel like I'm just supporting him in the best way I know how. Just voting and letting him know how great his music is.
I just want what is best for him in the long run. If that means winning--great. If not, it won't matter. He is already a champion.
And to think I don't even watch the show and am appalled that I used the initials AI.
I mostly just want Rae to react to my posting of comments.
And as far as AI not being about music and only being about money.. that's ridiculous. So many contestants have been able to make a career out of making music and that's what it's about. All of them are not multi-platinum sellers, but they are still able to create music rather than waitress or do hair.
Having said that, I really don't believe Carrie Underwood is upset with being controlled on her first album. It was hugely successful and I am sure she's happy with the results.. I wonder if she would be as big had she not won. I would like to think she would because she is incredible-- but she was definitely promoted after her big win.
Interesting... I am not trying to fight here-- just so you know.. just having a friendly conversation :)
nM--I feel graced by your very presence on my blog. Thank you for giving me your very rusty 2 cents...j/k and yes, you used the initials AI. I knew you were a fan. I have to disagree about AI being purely a money making machine--while it clearly has its faults (I'll be the first to spout them off--in alphabetical order if you'd like) I think Janet is right. It's more about the music (if the contestants are given the chance to truly express themselves as they deem appropriate). But the system is flawed, as evidence of the producers not allowing Archie to perform his interpretation of the song "Longer". Don't even get me started on that one. Thanks for your input Bro.
Janet--are you kidding? I am always up for a friendly debate. I should have known you'd make me think twice about certain things (being married to an attorney and all). It must rub off on you. Kidding.
I don't think Carrie was upset at the time about her album, she was probably THRILLED about the huge success it had. I think looking back though, she realized how much freedom she had in Carnival Ride...and didn't realize what she was missing. That said, it was interesting to me that she was so open about it (her reference to the control that AI had over her first album/year of fame.
I'm sure both Davids are WELL on their way to having platinum albums. And I can't wait to have them both! (But I won't lie--I'll have to buy Archies' first...priorities).
No hard feelings here Janet--let's banter a little more...what else can we disagree about? :)
I would probably feel better if I looked at the good press...Don't know where to find it.
I feel very invested in AI...it is sad really---like something changes once it is all over.
I feel like people I have stuck with usually never win, like Melinda from last season and Chris. So, I am not sure what to think.
I disagree about Idol being better for cook. I see Idol as more of a sounding board for the young. When you are older and more established ( like Cook) in your Career) it is harder to let Idol define you, wheras good old Archie still doesn't know who he is---could use some help in the music choices. Cook likes to pick all his own.
It is almost as if COok realizes he does not want to be defined by idol. I feel like he hasn't been trying as much, and doesn't care if he goes on or not. Is that just me???? Almost as if he wanted to pull a "chris" and make it to the top 4, get known, but get out. He even admitted himself that he never really wanted it.
I agree that it was all pointed toward Cook on tuesday---Pathetic...truly pathetic...but that is the nature of the show. I only complain about it when it is against my favorites.
There is just to much to say on the matter...so i will end withI am still wanting our hometown boy to win....
But I hope DA wins. I don't really care about the money, or the fame, or the control- I just want the person I like the best to win, and I don't want to think about anything else, except enjoy the music. Am I a bad american?
And, while I think David Cook is talented, and like his music- I don't like to look at him- I feel like he is to pasty white, too short (yeah, I said it) and too much of a smug beast urd.
Good luck David A...I guess I did leave a short story.
It's also true that I only complain about the nature of the beast (of AI) when it doesn't support my favorites. heh. :)
Dee--don't feel intimidated, you didn't leave a short story. Please. And you are NOT a bad American for just enjoying the music. I actually wish I was less analytical about the whole thing because I'd probably enjoy it more! I just get so wrapped up in it, that I feel freakishly possessive over my favorites :)
So people--we need to vote! for DA of course.
I really don't know why everyone is giving American Idol a hard time about being unfair. Hello.. they can do anything they want. They own the show and if the contestants were unhappy about being unfairly treated, they can leave and try to start their career somewhere else. The show has EVERY right to pick who sings what and make the public think what they may. That is actually what makes the show great and why we've liked it for all these years.
As far as Carrie Underwood complaining about control of her first CD.. even after the fact, I don't believe it. She has got to be SO grateful to the show and for all the "control" they had over her because they made her what she is. If she didn't want their opinion, then she could have made her first CD without them (and no one would have purchased it) We love Carrie because they portrayed her they way they did... small farm town girl, naive, sweet, beautiful. And she won because they favored her.. and because she is just darn likeable and GORGEOUS. She won awards this weekend and still never forgets to thank the people who made her what she is... AI.
I just think that people (including myself) take this show too seriously. We are doing a disservice to talk about David Archuleta in the way that we do. I know that it's BLOWN way out of proportion in Utah because everyone is so happy to have a famous Mormon.. but the rest of the world doesn't see him so holy or untouchable. He is a great singer. He seems like a really nice kid, but he's not perfect. He will do well with or without the title and so will David Cook. If the show is trying to control who wins, let them.. as long as we're not emotionally invested in the contestants, then we will all be okay.
DA gets away with it (being short) in my head because he's still so young. But David Cook looks like one of the brothers from the Shire. And his feet are too long for his body height. (Am I really criticizing someone else's body?)
I have a short phobia- so what. I could listen to DC all day, so much as I don't have to see him and his smug facial expressions, and everything else I said up there. Hot or not? NOT!!
I hope the littler one kicks the little ones butt!!
I think it's pretty narrow minded to assume that Mormons and/or Utahns are the major percentage of the voters. I don't care what religion someone is...or where they are from. Of course it's fun to have a local who just happens to be Mormon be in the top 2. If there was a Mormon from Vegas, you'd probably be just as excited for him. It's funny that you said most of the non LDS people in Vegas like Cook because most of my non member friends in Cali and Arizona like Archuleta. It's all about personal taste.
I still don't agree that we're doing a "disservice" by talking and/or praising Archuleta. I know he's not perfect--we're not praising his perfection. We're praising his talent, just as much as some people are praising Cook for being HOT, or for being a great entertainer. It is what it is.
I guess as far as the "control" issue goes--I just see it as immoral. Many of the contestants, especially the young ones don't understand what they're getting themselves into. And yeah--they can leave if they want, but that would be foolish as we all know. I'm all about them getting as much attention as they can, but sometimes you can do better if you aren't crowned the idol. I think it just depends on the person. Obviously Taylor Hicks didn't do so well, but Carrie and Kelly have done amazing things. We'll see what happens this year. Should be interesting!
Do I think that people are voting for David Cook because of his HOTNESS.. some probably are, but that's an insult to his talent.
I don't see any type of immorality issues with American Idols control over what airs and what doesn't. They have already done Archie a TON of favors.. he's been aired since the beginning. We knew his story from his audition and the producers have wanted him in the finale.. no doubt about that. And it will be a great one! Can't wait!
The finale is going to be a good one. What are we going to do when it's over? get lives, I guess.